Starfield Lighting Automation's Contribution to Lighting
By Vincent Caruso September 2016 – Green Building Design
As the domains of science and industry continue to grow in acquiescence to the urgent demands of environmental pressures, sustainability in design and architecture is becoming ever more embedded into the mold of our daily lives. Once a luxury limited to the virtuous precincts of high society with access to self-styled eco-friendly design firms on the upper-end of the scale, energy efficient methodologies are increasingly as fundamental to the contractor’s inventory as brick and mortar. And out of this democratization of green values has emerged a paradigm shift in the epistemic underpinning that not only encourages the inclusion of energy performance of built environments, but posits how such features ought to perform.
It’s a question to which Ohio-based Geneva Middle School was made acquainted by revolutionary Starfield Lighting Automation, whose technology proves seemingly as celestial as its name suggests. Because utilizing environmentally friendly technologies had until recently demanded fairly immodest means, much of what the marketplace produced has often been marked by ostentatious user modules and a sleek modernist design, signaling and asserting their value. Boulder-based Starfield Lighting Automation, despite its techno-futuristic connotation, has turned this formality inside out. With the automated daylighting apparatus, with which they equipped Geneva Middle School, the effectiveness of the system is directly measured by how removed it is from the visual and mental peripheries of those actively benefiting from it.
Inventing the Next Generation of Occupancy Sensors
How an unlikely marriage of fire alarms and beehives lead to a new way of thinking about and using occupancy sensors.
The next generation of occupancy sensors is completely different. They can be added or removed as needed, bridged between rooms, remotely tripped, and automatically interface with AV systems. Conventional sensors may be able to do a few of these but certainly not all and then only with a lot of programming and general hassle. Packing all this capacity into a single sensor required a new way of thinking. This is the story of how that new thinking came to be.
In the Beginning
The development of Starfield’s LS230 natural logic occupancy sensor begins 150 years ago with the invention of electric fire alarms. Back then, electricity was new and the idea of combining a fire detector and switch was pretty high tech. When fire was detected, the switch closed and an alarm activated. When larger areas required more sensors, the additional sensors were wired in parallel so that closure of any one switch activated the alarm. Simple and effective.
Development of digital occupancy sensors at Starfield started out in a similar way. However, as the limitations of the Boolean approach became apparent, we started looking for something better. It took a while but we found that something better hiding all around us.
Beehives, markets, traffic, and just about everything in the natural world don’t use Boolean logic. Instead, natural systems use an unstructured approach that allows them to interact and adapt. The scientific term for this approach is Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS). Such systems have the admirable properties of being self-organizing and inherently robust, resilient, and flexible. There is no bee hive program and certainly no central controller to run such a program if it did exist. Rather, beehives, markets, and all other natural phenomena are emergent properties of the interaction of independent agents.
So that is what we created – a swarm of smart, independent sensors acting together to create an emergent occupancy control system.
We patented this new approach and named it a Master-Scout or just a Scout system to distinguish it from conventional Master-Slave systems. In Boolean systems, the Master must know of and keep track of the state of each Slave sensor. In contrast, Scout sensors are anonymous and instead of tracking states they report events. Scout systems have a Master but it neither knows of nor monitors individual sensors. Like its beehive cousin, a Scout system has no member list and individual Scouts may come and go while the occupancy system just keeps right on humming along.